The Machinery of Suffering and the Art of Escape
- dingirfecho
- Sep 11
- 4 min read
đ Introduction: Samsara as Machine
Lama Fede:When people hear about karma and samsara, they often imagine a god punishing or rewarding. But in Buddhism, samsara is not a deity. It is a machine.
Think of a factory: at first, the roar of gears is deafening. Over time, it fades to background noise. That is samsara â a system so constant we forget itâs there.
The Buddha said:
âSamsara is without beginning or end, a prison built by ignorance, maintained by craving, bound by karma.â (Samyutta Nikaya)
Philip K. Dick saw the same truth:
âEveryone dwelt in the Black Iron Prison without realizing it.â (VALIS)
đ Dependent Origination as Code
Lama Sherab:The Buddha described this machine through dependent origination. Ignorance gives rise to craving; craving leads to clinging; clinging leads to becoming. Itâs a causal loop.
Lama Fede:Think of it like code: if ignorance, then craving; if craving, then clinging.
Or more simply: you open your phone âjust for a second.â Hours later, youâre still scrolling. That is craving as the drive belt of the machinery. The algorithm feeds the loop â karma written in digital form.
đš Occult and Artistic Visions of the Machine
Lama Fede:Artists and magicians have seen samsaraâs machinery too:
Austin Osman Spare (Chaos Magick) mapped desire as hidden machinery through his Alphabet of Desire.
Genesis P-Orridge (Psychick TV) used ritual and noise to jam the gears of consensus reality.
The Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU)Â â Nick Land & Sadie Plant â described reality as cybernetic feedback: desire loops feeding desire, until subjectivity disappears.
The Buddha called this táčáčŁáčÄ: thirst, craving, endless repetition.
đ Critical Theory Parallels
Lama Sherab:Philosophers have described samsaraâs machine in their own ways:
Mark Fisher: âIt is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.â Samsara as capitalist realism.
Baudrillard: Simulacra & Simulation â reality dissolves into endless signs.
Foucault: institutions (schools, prisons, hospitals) are devices that invisibly train behavior.
Each shows how systems feel natural, inevitable â until we realize theyâre built.
đŹ The Matrix Problem
Lama Sherab:Perhaps the most famous modern metaphor is The Matrix. People wake up from one illusion â only to find themselves in another world, still hierarchical, still imperfect.
The machine doesnât stop just because you âseeâ it. Even resistance becomes part of the cycle.
Lama Fede:And then thereâs Neo. He learns his first world was false, but the ârealâ one still casts him as the Chosen One. He never doubts whether this new reality is also another simulation. Samsara delights in recycling illusions.
âïž The Gears of the Machine
Lama Fede:To escape, we must see how the gears turn:
Ignorance = Engine â belief in a permanent self and solid objects.
Craving = Drive Belt â desires keep the wheels spinning.
Aversion = Feedback Loop â pushing pain only reinforces cycles.
Karma = Code â every action records and repeats, laying down tracks like a road worn into being.
Once you see these gears, samsara is no longer mystical. It is mechanical.
đ€ïž Three Paths of Escape
Lama Sherab:So how do we escape?
Buddhist way: mindfulness creates pauses in the loop; compassion breaks self-centered programming; insight reveals the gears are empty.
Occult way: sigils reprogram desire; rituals disrupt; dreamwork rewrites the code from within.
Critical way: media literacy reveals ideology; Situationist play hijacks the machine; theory itself names the invisible apparatus.

đ„ Escape or Repurpose?
Lama Fede:There are two strategies:
Some say: shut it down. Nirvana as cessation.
Others say: repurpose it. Tantra, chaos magick, theorycrafting â transforming poison into medicine.
Both are escape. Both mean not being crushed by gears.
đ§© Simulacra and Simulacrum
Lama Jilly:Let me ask a question. If someone believes in the simulacra but not the simulacrum, are they Jain? If they believe in both, are they Advaita Vedanta? And if they believe in the simulacrum but not the simulacra, are they just materialists?
Lama Fede:Baudrillardâs terms donât map perfectly onto Dharma. But yes, each position echoes non-Buddhist systems searching for substance. Buddhism rejects both: there is no eternal simulacrum, nor true simulacra. Only dependent arising.
Lama Sherab:Exactly. The problem isnât whether there are simulacra or simulacrum â itâs the habit of conceiving either.
đ Conclusion: The Art of Awareness
Lama Fede:The machinery of suffering runs on ignorance. The art of escape runs on awareness.
When you see the gears, you donât have to be caught in them. When you pause, the machine stutters. When awareness is shared in sangha and community, the prison walls falter.
That is the Dharma. That is the art of escape.
Next week: Lama Sherab will lead us into the world of Namthars, exploring historical imagination as spiritual practice.
Comments